https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1976012 --- Comment #23 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Peter Hutterer from comment #22) > > The devel package needs to depend on the libs package now. :) > > ♫ 99 issues with the review request ♩ > ♪ 99 things to change ♬ > ♬ fix them all, submit it again ♪ > ♩ 99 issues with the review request ♫ > It almost feels like a song could be made out of this, but I promise the wait is nearly over! :) > Done, same sources. > > > That's an interesting argument. The way I tend to look at it is that by having the information in sync with what Meson is actually looking for, it's less likely to fail in the future if things get reorganized. > > Yeah, I generally agree (I think most of my other packages now use > pkgconfig) but here it's clunky. glib has a lot of .pc files so we need to > check for 4 of those. pipewire has 2. but gobject-introspection-devel is > still the package because WP checks for a binary, not the .pc file. So it's > all a bit messy, IMO. But that's not a hill I'm willing to engage windmills > in aggressive conduct on, so I've changed it to pkgconfig now. No worries, I wasn't going to force it either. But I'm glad it's changed. :) -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
