https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970073 --- Comment #3 from Major Hayden 🤠 <mhayden@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Fabio Valentini from comment #2) > Note: I am not 100% sure if adding the Provides for the old package name in > *all* successor packages is the right thing to do. The Obsoletes should > definetly be in all successors to make sure the upgrade works as expected, > but the Provides could end up in only one of the new azure-core packages. In > that case, only that one package would need an Epoch (to artificially bump > its version above 5.0.0). The challenging part here is that we're going from one big package to lots of small packages which don't have a "main" package of any sort. Sure, python-azure-core and python-azure-common are the most basic dependencies of the whole Azure SDK, but there's no single main package. Does that change anything? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
