https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1970073 --- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> --- Note: I am not 100% sure if adding the Provides for the old package name in *all* successor packages is the right thing to do. The Obsoletes should definetly be in all successors to make sure the upgrade works as expected, but the Provides could end up in only one of the new azure-core packages. In that case, only that one package would need an Epoch (to artificially bump its version above 5.0.0). -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
