https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953633 --- Comment #10 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Mark Wielaard from comment #9) > Note the upstream discussion about the exact installation location of the > executables is here: > https://sourceware.org/pipermail/debugedit/2021-March/000026.html > For now the consensus (if there really is one) seems to be that it doesn't > really matter much, but given that the executables have a documented user > interface (or should have one) bindir is more appropriate than libexecdir. > > Could we move this discussion on bin/libexec to the upstream list? It seems > the fedora package should simply follow what is decided upstream. > > Are there any other spec review issues to resolve? If you expect *users* to use it, then make man pages and document it and fix the weird ".sh" name for "find-debuginfo". Otherwise, move it to "%{_libexecdir}/debugedit" and deal with making it available in "%{_bindir}" later once you've sorted it out. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
