[Bug 1953633] Review Request: debugedit - Tools for debuginfo creation

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1953633



--- Comment #9 from Mark Wielaard <mjw@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> ---
Note the upstream discussion about the exact installation location of the
executables is here:
https://sourceware.org/pipermail/debugedit/2021-March/000026.html
For now the consensus (if there really is one) seems to be that it doesn't
really matter much, but given that the executables have a documented user
interface (or should have one) bindir is more appropriate than libexecdir.

Could we move this discussion on bin/libexec to the upstream list? It seems the
fedora package should simply follow what is decided upstream.

Are there any other spec review issues to resolve?


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux