https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1947670 Patrik Polakovič <ppolakov@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Comment|0 |updated --- Comment #0 has been edited --- Spec URL: https://gist.githubusercontent.com/ppolakov/b51d20a4ee53d42719bbb7e280dd9370/raw/401dbf2668947ca657b983aa88fe99b883375956/monocypher.spec SRPM URL: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/patrikp/Monocypher/fedora-rawhide-x86_64/02130042-monocypher/monocypher-3.1.2-1.fc35.src.rpm Description: Monocypher is an easy to use cryptographic library. It provides functions for authenticated encryption, hashing, password hashing and key derivation, key exchange, and public key signatures. It is: - Small. Monocypher contains under 2000 lines of code, small enough to allow audits. The binaries can be under 50KB, small enough for many embedded targets. - Easy to deploy. Just add monocypher.c and monocypher.h to your project. They compile as C99 or C++ and are dedicated to the public domain (CC0-1.0, alternatively 2-clause BSD). - Portable. There are no dependencies, not even on libc. - Honest. The API is small, consistent, and cannot fail on correct input. - Direct. The abstractions are minimal. A developer with experience in applied cryptography can be productive in minutes. - Fast. The primitives are fast to begin with, and performance wasn't needlessly sacrificed. Monocypher holds up pretty well against Libsodium, despite being closer in size to TweetNaCl. Hello. This is my first package and I would be very thankful if somebody could review it. I am also in need of a sponsor. I have used rpmlint on the SPEC file, the Binary RPM, and the SRPM -- I am getting no errors and no warnings. I am also including a link for a successful koji build. Disclaimer: I am merely the packager, not the upstream maintainer. Fedora Account System Username: patrikp koji scratch build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=65810208 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
