https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933412 --- Comment #8 from Dominik 'Rathann' Mierzejewski <dominik@xxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Antonio T. sagitter from comment #6) > > Please open a ticket with upstream asking for s390x support, too. > > Supported architectures are explicitly listed by Upstream: > https://github.com/google/cpu_features#support That doesn't mean you can't open an issue asking about it. From what I can tell, nobody has done that so far. > > Is there a particular reason not to name this simply "cpu_features" without the google- prefix? > > There are other google-* package (like google-bechmark) in Fedora, and they > come from the same Google Open Source repositories; it's a correct way to > name this package in my opinion. Alright. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
