https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1933464 --- Comment #11 from Phil Dibowitz <phil@xxxxxxxx> --- * no, that `find` was debug, good catch thanks * The ruby packaging guidelines are clear here, and they afaict disagree with you: ``` Packages that contain Ruby Gems MUST be called rubygem-%{gem_name}. ``` The binary package that provides an application I don't think makes sense as rubygem- but the requirements are clear that the base package must be rubygem- * I can poke at reordering the globals in the next build, I assume that's what you mean * re: spec Oops, missed that one, good call * The specs are unit tests not functional tests and do not work in the installdir, they only work in the source, which is why I did it that way. I did originally use gem2rpm, but it went through a lot of revisions since then... Feedback appreciated! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Do not reply to spam on the list, report it: https://pagure.io/fedora-infrastructure
