[Bug 378431] Review Request: evolution-python - Python bindings for manipulating evolution data

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: evolution-python - Python bindings for manipulating evolution data


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=378431


panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
               Flag|fedora-review?              |fedora-review+




------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx  2007-11-14 00:00 EST -------
Review:
+ package builds in mock (development i386).
+ rpmlint is silent for SRPM, But NOT for RPM.
  evolution-python.i386: W: devel-file-in-non-devel-package
/usr/lib/pkgconfig/evolution-python.pc
  ==> We can ignore this for thi spackage instead of creating a -devel for
installing single file.
+ source files match upstream url
2d08555f0a6de288bfcc3b048d98b3e4  evolution-python-0.0.4.tar.gz
+ package meets naming and packaging guidelines.
+ specfile is properly named, is cleanly written
+ Spec file is written in American English.
+ Spec file is legible.
+ dist tag is present.
+ build root is correct.
+ license is open source-compatible.
+ License text is included in package.
+ BuildRequires are proper.
+ Compiler flags used correctly.
+ defattr usage is correct.
+ %clean is present.
+ package installed properly.
+ Macro use appears rather consistent.
+ Package contains code, not content.
+ no headers or static libraries.
+ evolution-python.pc file present.
+ -devel subpackage not needed for single file.
+ no .la files.
+ no translations are available.
+ Does owns the directories it creates.
+ no scriptlets present.
+ no duplicates in %files.
+ file permissions are appropriate.
+ Package evolution-python-0.0.4-2.fc9 ->
  Provides: ebook.so ecal.so
  Requires: libORBit-2.so.0 libbonobo-2.so.0 libbonobo-activation.so.4 libc.so.6
libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.0) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.1.3) libc.so.6(GLIBC_2.4) libdl.so.2
libebook-1.2.so.9 libecal-1.2.so.7 libedataserver-1.2.so.9 libgconf-2.so.4
libgdk_pixbuf-2.0.so.0 libglib-2.0.so.0 libgmodule-2.0.so.0 libgnome-2.so.0
libgobject-2.0.so.0 libgthread-2.0.so.0 libpango-1.0.so.0 libpopt.so.0
libpthread.so.0 librt.so.1 libxml2.so.2 pkgconfig python(abi) = 2.5 rtld(GNU_HASH)
+ Not a GUI App.
APPROVED.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]