https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1925759 Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEW |ASSIGNED CC| |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Assignee|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek <zbyszek@xxxxxxxxx> --- > %{_datadir}/man/man1/disorderfs.1.gz → %{_datadir}/man/man1/disorderfs.1* (We might want to change the default compression alg at some point.) Maybe update to 0.5.11? Are the tags under https://reproducible-builds.org/_lfs/releases/disorderfs/ reliable? If yes, then we'd want to have signature verification as described in https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_source_file_verification > %doc README The README has no useful information. Maybe do '%doc NEWS' instead? + package name is OK + latest version (almost ;)) + license is acceptable for Fedora (GPLv3+) + license is specified correctly + builds fine in mock + B/R/PR seem to be specified correctly + fedora-review and rpmlint find no issues -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
