https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1922869 --- Comment #2 from Neal Gompa <ngompa13@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Carl George 🤠 from comment #1) > What's the purpose of the %_distconfdir macro? Gentle reminder that only > Fedora and EPEL macros are allowed in Fedora spec files [0]. > Right, %_distconfdir is something from openSUSE, which points to /usr/etc[1]. I can, of course, drop it and just change it back to %_prefix/%_sysconfdir, since I'm only using it to delete stuff right now. [1]: https://en.opensuse.org/openSUSE:Packaging_UsrEtc > From how I'm reading the upstream license [1], there needs to be some > license adjustments in the spec file. The -libs and -devel subpackages are > "GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+", and need the license field and %license files to > reflect that. Everything else is just GPLv2+. > > [0] > https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#_spec_legibility > [1] https://github.com/openSUSE/transactional-update/blob/v3.0.0/COPYING The source package includes all the things, so I put the "GPLv2+ and LGPLv2+" term there, while appropriately setting the licenses (GPLv2+ or LGPLv2+) for each subpackage based on what the headers in the files said for each subpackage. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
