https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1897434 --- Comment #3 from Jens Petersen <petersen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for reviewing the package (In reply to Tristan Cacqueray from comment #2) > - Doesn't hackage publish gpg signature? Not that I know of: it would be a good idea though. > - The project has a test directory but it's not defined in the cabal file, > so i guess it would be complicated to add the %check section. I only see it in git: not sure if that dir is still managed. > - The doc example correctly compiled and ran after package install > - It seems like %{name}-devel.files list has spurious-executable-perm, though > i'm not sure how the list is created. Okay I can fix the examples/ permissions, good catch, thanks > 3 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 15 warnings. > ghc-haxr.x86_64: W: undefined-non-weak-symbol > /usr/lib64/libHShaxr-3000.11.4.1-Eu5eecauzHf7zckkFLlx8r-ghc8.8.4.so > stg_gc_unpt_r1 > > [..] lots of other undefined-non-weak-symbol for stg_ Yeah I hope this gets fixed in ghc some day. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
