[Bug 1907238] Review Request: openexr - Provides the specification and reference implementation of the EXR file format

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1907238



--- Comment #5 from Richard Shaw <hobbes1069@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Zbigniew Jędrzejewski-Szmek from comment #3)
> > Description:
> > OpenEXR is a project of the [Academy Software
> > Foundation](https://www.aswf.io).
> > The format and library were originally developed by Industrial Light & Magic
> > and first released in 2003.  Weta Digital, Walt Disney Animation Studios,
> > Sony
> > Pictures Imageworks, Pixar Animation Studios, DreamWorks, and other studios,
> > companies, and individuals have made contributions to the code base.
> 
> Description + Summary don't actually say what this package and the format
> are *for*
> (images, video, something else?). Not everybody knows what "EXR" means. Also,
> I think the blurb about authors is not interesting for users.

Yeah, I copied that and a lot more from the README. I may borrow from the
current OpenEXR package.


> > %{_bindir}/*
> Maybe '%{_bindir}/exr*' ? This will make it less likely to something
> unintended to slip in on upgrades.
> 
> rpmlint:
> openexr.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US containes -> contained,
> contains, containers

Since I copied it straight from their readme I guess I should let them know :)


> > # Is it OK to dump the libraries in site-packages?
> It means that the modules 'iex' and 'imath' will be importable in the global
> namespace.
> It's certainly allowed in general. I think the name is a bit generic in this
> case, but
> it's not something we have influence over.

Most dedicated python packages that I maintain put them in a named subdirectory
but yeah, I looked in my system and there's lots of packages that dump them
right in site-packages.


> + license is acceptable for Fedora (BSD 3 clause)
> + license is specified correctly
> + builds and installs OK
> + BR and Requires look correct
> + Provides and Obsoletes look correct took
> 
> Package is APPROVED.

Thanks!


-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux