https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1901740 --- Comment #2 from Michel Alexandre Salim <michel@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Richard Shaw from comment #1) > I'm completely unfamiliar with LUA packaging so bear with me... > > 1. Where does the license come from? There's nothing in the package and > licensecheck couldn't derive anything from the files in the archive. > Yeah, nothing in the tarball mentions the license. It's listed in Luarocks (Lua's equivalent to pypi) (which is linked to from the documentation): http://luarocks.org/modules/peterbillam/readline (if you click on any of the version e.g. 2.7-0 and look at the rockspec file, it lists the license too) > 2. Is the C- prepended on the library because it's C based? There doesn't > seem to be any official LUA packaging guidelines for Fedora. I'm following the author's intention here. The Lua module (readline.lua) requires the C module as C-readline: specs/lua/readline-2.7 on master [?] ❯ grep "require 'C-readline'" readline.lua local initialise = require 'C-readline' I'm working on packaging guidelines for Lua (as well as some automated packaging tool) but they're not ready yet, my bad. Hopefully soon enough we'll be able to run `rock2spec readline` and it will download the rockspec and generate a reasonable spec. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
