https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1885495 --- Comment #22 from Yogaraj Alamenda <yogarajx.alamenda@xxxxxxxxx> --- We are planning to make one more change for library installation along with the license change where qatengine.so gets installed directly in the engines dir (/usr/lib64/engine-1.1) as the application that need to use engine can only be accessed via OpenSSL and there is no other application that can directly use qatengine. Makefile changes: qatengine_la_LDFLAGS = -module -no-undefined -avoid-version -shared This means there will be no versioned libary in the standard library dir. Could you please confirm having library installed directly in engines dir is fine as we see this approach being used by other engines in Redhat. Also please let us about license question on comment #21 because BSD/GPLv2 and GPLv2 are not used in the RPM. We are planning to do upstream release with changes based on your confirmation. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
