https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1890821 --- Comment #3 from Robert Scheck <redhat-bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #2) > so you can use %cmake3 for all Given the "CMake to do out-of-source" [1] caused issues on non-Fedora branches for multiple of my packages, I would like to stick with default %cmake as much as I can and only use %cmake3 where it is absolutely needed (= EPEL 7 only). It also makes it easier to rip it out in < 4 years when EPEL 7 reaches EOL. [1] https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Changes/CMake_to_do_out-of-source_builds > - Please specify the license breakdown: > > License: GPLv2+ and BSD and RSA Changed and breaked down in the spec file. However what is called "Expat License" by licensecheck(1) is IMHO effectively "MIT", especially as "Expat License" doesn't seem to be a valid license mentioned at https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main. What licensecheck(1) calls "NTP License" is only applicable as fallback license if "Public Domain" is "deemed null and void" (modules/encryption/enc_bcrypt.cpp). Not sure how I could express such a condition in the license tag, thus I skipped it as Fedora treats "Public Domain" as per https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main as a good "license". Spec URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/anope.spec SRPM URL: http://labs.linuxnetz.de/bugzilla/anope-2.0.9-2.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
