https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887470 --- Comment #2 from Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > [ ]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > Note: Dirs in package are owned also by: > /usr/include/traceevent(trace-cmd-devel), /usr/lib64/traceevent(perf, > trace-cmd-libs), /usr/lib64/traceevent/plugins(perf, trace-cmd-libs) > > This is intended. The aim of the upstream traceevent is to make this a > shared library to be consumed by perf, trace-cmd and others. I'm also the > trace-cmd packager and working on solving the dependency after this library > is in Fedora. The perf part will be ready when it's done in upstream kernel > repo. so what's the plan in here? start with libtracevent and perf as conflict packages and then remove those plugins from perf rpm? if that's the plan maybe we could ake this conflict explicit, I think there's 'Conflicts:' for that other note: - package version and the library version do not match, %{_libdir}/libtraceevent.so.1.1.0 vs Version: 0 Release: 0.1.%{commitdate}git%{shortcommit}%{?dist} might be good to put version values to variables, so you'll update only one place during the rpm update jirka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
