https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1886858 Andy Mender <andymenderunix@xxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|ASSIGNED |POST Flags|fedora-review? |fedora-review+ --- Comment #3 from Andy Mender <andymenderunix@xxxxxxxxx> --- > I respect your suggestion. However, I have to say that I have never seen the Fedora guidelines encourage the creation of upstream forks, [...] What I was trying to say was that if the project is worth it, but is completely unmaintained and you might have the time and/or know-how to maintain it, it would be worthwhile to fork it. It's indirectly mentioned in "Unmaintained Or Unresponsive Upstream Projects" from the guidelines you posted. Before that happens, of course, upstream should be informed and that discussed with them properly, and indicated that the project is a fork in the SPEC file. As for the review, very thoroughly done. Package approved! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
