https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1887091 --- Comment #4 from Erich Eickmeyer <erich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #2) > Koji build: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=53166967 > > It fails on armv7hl and i686. Please, have a look at the logs. > Oops, forgot to check for build failures in my copr builds. In fact, it's not meant to build on either of those architectures, so I'll have to exclude those archs. > > License: GPLv2 > > licensecheck found a file with the MIT license. If it's not a mistake, that > should be included in the License field with a comment above mentioning that > only this file has a different license. > > Expat License > ------------- > jack_mixer-release-13/nsmclient.py Looks like Expat, not MIT. They're two different licenses (ran into something like this in my Ubuntu packages where it was Expat but I said MIT). > > > BuildRequires: autoconf > > BuildRequires: automake > > BuildRequires: python3-gobject-devel > > BuildRequires: python3-cairo-devel > > BuildRequires: python3-devel > > BuildRequires: jack-audio-connection-kit-devel > > BuildRequires: glib2-devel > > Requires: jack-audio-connection-kit > > Requires: python3-gobject > > Requires: python3 > > Requires: python3-cairo > > Python dependencies should be declared following the format > "python3dist(foo)". Ran into this when I tried that: No matching package to install: 'python3dist(cairo)' No matching package to install: 'python3dist(gobject)' So, considering every other package I've done with python dependencies, this is the first time I've run into that requirement. Apparently it doesn't work. > > %changelog > > * Sat Oct 10 2020 Erich Eickmeyer <erich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> > > - New package for Fedora > > %changelog entries should contain the version and release like so: > > * Sat Oct 10 2020 Erich Eickmeyer <erich@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> - 13-1 Yep, minor oversight. Fixed. > > There is extra stuff covered in the main review body: > > Package Review > ============== > > Legend: > [x] = Pass, [!] = Fail, [-] = Not applicable, [?] = Not evaluated > [ ] = Manual review needed > > > Issues: > ======= > - If your application is a C or C++ application you must list a > BuildRequires against gcc, gcc-c++ or clang. > Note: No gcc, gcc-c++ or clang found in BuildRequires > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/C_and_C++/ > - Package does not contain any libtool archives (.la) > Note: jack-mixer : /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/jack_mixer_c.la > See: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging- > guidelines/#packaging-static-libraries > - Package installs a %{name}.desktop using desktop-file-install or desktop- > file-validate if there is such a file. > > > ===== MUST items ===== > > C/C++: > [x]: Package does not contain kernel modules. > [x]: Package contains no static executables. > [ ]: Development (unversioned) .so files in -devel subpackage, if present. > Note: Unversioned so-files in private %_libdir subdirectory (see > attachment). Verify they are not in ld path. > Review: are these internal to the package? They should indeed be internal to the package. This is not intended as a development library but as a standalone application. > [x]: Header files in -devel subpackage, if present. > [x]: Rpath absent or only used for internal libs. > > Generic: > [x]: Package successfully compiles and builds into binary rpms on at least > one supported primary architecture. > Note: Using prebuilt packages > [x]: Package is licensed with an open-source compatible license and meets > other legal requirements as defined in the legal section of Packaging > Guidelines. > [!]: License field in the package spec file matches the actual license. > Note: Checking patched sources after %prep for licenses. Licenses > found: "Unknown or generated", "GNU Lesser General Public License", > "GPL (v2)", "GNU General Public License", "*No copyright* GPL (v2)", > "Expat License". 20 files have unknown license. Detailed output of > licensecheck in /home/amender/rpmbuild/SPECS/jack-mixer/jack- > mixer/licensecheck.txt > [x]: License file installed when any subpackage combination is installed. > [!]: Package must own all directories that it creates. > Note: Directories without known owners: > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22/apps, > /usr/share/icons/hicolor, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32/apps, > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/22x22, > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/32x32, > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable/apps, > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/16x16/apps, > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/48x48/apps, > /usr/share/icons/hicolor/scalable, /usr/share/icons/hicolor/24x24/apps > Review: jack-mixer should have a Requires on hicolor-icon-theme Fixed. > [x]: %build honors applicable compiler flags or justifies otherwise. > [x]: Package contains no bundled libraries without FPC exception. > [!]: Changelog in prescribed format. > [x]: Sources contain only permissible code or content. > [-]: Development files must be in a -devel package > [?]: Package uses nothing in %doc for runtime. > [x]: Package consistently uses macros (instead of hard-coded directory > names). > [x]: Package is named according to the Package Naming Guidelines. > [x]: Package does not generate any conflict. > [x]: Package obeys FHS, except libexecdir and /usr/target. > [-]: If the package is a rename of another package, proper Obsoletes and > Provides are present. > [!]: Requires correct, justified where necessary. > Review: mentioned before. > [x]: Spec file is legible and written in American English. > [-]: Package contains systemd file(s) if in need. > [x]: Useful -debuginfo package or justification otherwise. > [x]: Package is not known to require an ExcludeArch tag. > [-]: Large documentation must go in a -doc subpackage. Large could be size > (~1MB) or number of files. > Note: Documentation size is 10240 bytes in 2 files. > [!]: Package complies to the Packaging Guidelines > Review: issues mentioned above. > [x]: Package installs properly. > [x]: Rpmlint is run on all rpms the build produces. > Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). > [x]: If (and only if) the source package includes the text of the > license(s) in its own file, then that file, containing the text of the > license(s) for the package is included in %license. > [x]: Package requires other packages for directories it uses. > [x]: Package does not own files or directories owned by other packages. > [x]: Package uses either %{buildroot} or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT > [x]: Package does not run rm -rf %{buildroot} (or $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) at the > beginning of %install. > [x]: Macros in Summary, %description expandable at SRPM build time. > [x]: Package contains desktop file if it is a GUI application. > [x]: Dist tag is present. > [x]: Package does not contain duplicates in %files. > [x]: Permissions on files are set properly. > [x]: Package must not depend on deprecated() packages. > [x]: Package use %makeinstall only when make install DESTDIR=... doesn't > work. > [x]: Package is named using only allowed ASCII characters. > [x]: Package does not use a name that already exists. > [x]: Package is not relocatable. > [x]: Sources used to build the package match the upstream source, as > provided in the spec URL. > [x]: Spec file name must match the spec package %{name}, in the format > %{name}.spec. > [x]: File names are valid UTF-8. > [x]: Packages must not store files under /srv, /opt or /usr/local > > ===== SHOULD items ===== > > Generic: > [x]: Reviewer should test that the package builds in mock. > Review: It does on x86_64 > [-]: If the source package does not include license text(s) as a separate > file from upstream, the packager SHOULD query upstream to include it. > [x]: Final provides and requires are sane (see attachments). > [?]: Package functions as described. > [x]: Latest version is packaged. > [x]: Package does not include license text files separate from upstream. > [-]: Sources are verified with gpgverify first in %prep if upstream > publishes signatures. > Note: gpgverify is not used. > [-]: Description and summary sections in the package spec file contains > translations for supported Non-English languages, if available. > [!]: Package should compile and build into binary rpms on all supported > architectures. > Review: fails on 2 architectures mentioned before. > [-]: %check is present and all tests pass. > [x]: Packages should try to preserve timestamps of original installed > files. > [x]: Buildroot is not present > [x]: Package has no %clean section with rm -rf %{buildroot} (or > $RPM_BUILD_ROOT) > [x]: No file requires outside of /etc, /bin, /sbin, /usr/bin, /usr/sbin. > [x]: Fully versioned dependency in subpackages if applicable. > [x]: Packager, Vendor, PreReq, Copyright tags should not be in spec file > [x]: Sources can be downloaded from URI in Source: tag > [x]: SourceX is a working URL. > [x]: Spec use %global instead of %define unless justified. > > ===== EXTRA items ===== > > Generic: > [x]: Rpmlint is run on debuginfo package(s). > Note: There are rpmlint messages (see attachment). > [x]: Rpmlint is run on all installed packages. > Note: No rpmlint messages. > [x]: Large data in /usr/share should live in a noarch subpackage if package > is arched. > [x]: Package should not use obsolete m4 macros > > > Rpmlint > ------- > Checking: jack-mixer-13-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm > jack-mixer-debuginfo-13-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm > jack-mixer-debugsource-13-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm > jack-mixer-13-1.fc34.src.rpm > jack-mixer.x86_64: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US faders -> fades, > fakers, waders > jack-mixer.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > jack-mixer.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: https://rdio.space/jack-mixer/ HTTP > Error 404: Not Found > jack-mixer.x86_64: E: non-executable-script > /usr/share/jack_mixer/nsmclient.py 644 /usr/bin/env python3 > jack-mixer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jack_mix_box > jack-mixer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jack_mixer > jack-mixer.x86_64: W: no-manual-page-for-binary jack_mixer.py > jack-mixer-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > jack-mixer-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: > https://rdio.space/jack-mixer/ HTTP Error 404: Not Found > jack-mixer-debugsource.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > jack-mixer-debugsource.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: > https://rdio.space/jack-mixer/ HTTP Error 404: Not Found > jack-mixer.src: W: spelling-error %description -l en_US faders -> fades, > fakers, waders > jack-mixer.src: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > jack-mixer.src: W: invalid-url URL: https://rdio.space/jack-mixer/ HTTP > Error 404: Not Found > jack-mixer.src:45: E: hardcoded-library-path in > %{_prefix}/lib/python%{python3_version}/site-packages/* > 4 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 2 errors, 13 warnings. > > > > > Rpmlint (debuginfo) > ------------------- > Checking: jack-mixer-debuginfo-13-1.fc34.x86_64.rpm > jack-mixer-debuginfo.x86_64: W: no-version-in-last-changelog > jack-mixer-debuginfo.x86_64: W: invalid-url URL: > https://rdio.space/jack-mixer/ HTTP Error 404: Not Found > 1 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 2 warnings. > > > > > > Rpmlint (installed packages) > ---------------------------- > (none): E: no installed packages by name jack-mixer-debuginfo > (none): E: no installed packages by name jack-mixer > (none): E: no installed packages by name jack-mixer-debugsource > 0 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 0 errors, 0 warnings. > > > > Unversioned so-files > -------------------- > jack-mixer: /usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/jack_mixer_c.so > > Source checksums > ---------------- > https://github.com/jack-mixer/jack_mixer/archive/release-13/jack-mixer-13. > tar.gz : > CHECKSUM(SHA256) this package : > 3ff60d6739fbbfeb7fd7dee06c6dc2f03fd0570e250f0fd0f7564fcf676f085b > CHECKSUM(SHA256) upstream package : > 3ff60d6739fbbfeb7fd7dee06c6dc2f03fd0570e250f0fd0f7564fcf676f085b > > > Requires > -------- > jack-mixer (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > /usr/bin/python3 > jack-audio-connection-kit > libc.so.6()(64bit) > libglib-2.0.so.0()(64bit) > libjack.so.0()(64bit) > libm.so.6()(64bit) > python(abi) > python3 > python3-cairo > python3-gobject > rtld(GNU_HASH) > > jack-mixer-debuginfo (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > > jack-mixer-debugsource (rpmlib, GLIBC filtered): > > > > Provides > -------- > jack-mixer: > application() > application(jack_mixer.desktop) > jack-mixer > jack-mixer(x86-64) > libtool(/usr/lib64/python3.9/site-packages/jack_mixer_c.la) > > jack-mixer-debuginfo: > debuginfo(build-id) > jack-mixer-debuginfo > jack-mixer-debuginfo(x86-64) > > jack-mixer-debugsource: > jack-mixer-debugsource > jack-mixer-debugsource(x86-64) Rebuilding now. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
