https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1862842 --- Comment #5 from Eric Smith <spacewar@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks for reviewing! I don't think the icon binary itself needs the icall.h header. I believe it is provided for the purpose of building add-on modules, so conceptually I think it would belong in a -devel subpackage, but it sounds like we're in agreement that it's not worth having a subpackage for just the one header file. I updated to 9.5.20i per your request, so I think this is ready to go. Spec URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/icon/icon.spec SRPM URL: https://fedorapeople.org/~brouhaha/icon/icon-9.5.20i-1.fc31.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
