[Bug 331731] Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional
comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report.

Summary: Review Request: ltsp-server - LTSP5 server-side configurations and setup scripts


https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=331731





------- Additional Comments From wtogami@xxxxxxxxxx  2007-11-01 16:51 EST -------
I think the reason it is implemented as a service is because it loses setuid
every time the fuse package is upgraded.  Ultimately, this sucks and we need a
cleaner way to do this.

Can't PolicyKit help us here?  PolicyKit is already used to dynamically grant
access to devices like the optical drive to a logged in user.

One possible problem with relying on PolicyKit might be xattr limits on /dev
nodes.  Any idea how many simultaneous users can be added to fsacl's to a tmpfs
file?

I somewhat agree with removing those dependencies... although there is some
attractiveness of installing one package that pulls in everything people
typically use.  Perhaps we could instead rely upon a yum group and comps.

-- 
Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email
------- You are receiving this mail because: -------
You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is.

_______________________________________________
Fedora-package-review mailing list
Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx
http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review

[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Legacy]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite News]     [KDE Users]     [Fedora Tools]