Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Merge Review: perl-Parse-RecDescent https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=226274 bugzilla@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Severity|normal |medium Priority|normal |medium Product|Fedora Extras |Fedora panemade@xxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- AssignedTo|nobody@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx |panemade@xxxxxxxxx Status|NEW |ASSIGNED Flag| |fedora-review? ------- Additional Comments From panemade@xxxxxxxxx 2007-10-29 01:18 EST ------- 1)perl as BR is not needed. mock build without it worked successfully. remove redundant dependency on perl >= 1:5.6.1 2) rpmlint gave me perl-Parse-RecDescent.noarch: W: file-not-utf8 /usr/share/doc/perl-Parse-RecDescent-1.95.1/demo/demo_dot.pl The character encoding of this file is not UTF-8. Consider converting it in the specfile for example using iconv(1). perl-Parse-RecDescent.noarch: W: incoherent-version-in-changelog 1.95-2 1.95.1-2.fc8 The last entry in %changelog contains a version identifier that is not coherent with the epoch:version-release tuple of the package. 3) make test skipped some tests PERL_DL_NONLAZY=1 /usr/bin/perl "-MExtUtils::Command::MM" "-e" "test_harness(0, 'blib/lib', 'blib/arch')" t/*.t t/00.load....# Testing Parse::RecDescent 1.95.1 ok t/basics.....Name "main::D" used only once: possible typo at t/basics.t line 15. ok t/pod........skipped all skipped: Test::Pod 1.14 required for testing POD All tests successful, 1 test skipped. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review