https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1376511 --- Comment #18 from Andy Mender <andymenderunix@xxxxxxxxx> --- > For the COPYING file, I wasn't sure if the file had to be 'installed' (hence the patch was to add that to CMake), but it looks like the %license macro picks it up from the source/build. If it's in the root of the source dir, using %license for license files and %doc for documentation files will add these to the correct directories :). > Wasn't sure how bad the first one is, but the second one is a false warning, as muon is spelt correctly. I think the first one is bogus as well. Don't worry about it. Last things reported by rpmlint: Rpmlint ------- [...] nexus.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/share/licenses/nexus/COPYING nexus-devel.x86_64: W: no-documentation nexus-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/nexus/napi.h nexus-devel.x86_64: E: incorrect-fsf-address /usr/include/nexus/napiu.h [...] 6 packages and 0 specfiles checked; 3 errors, 8 warnings. A rather minor item, but I would add the COPYING file to the -devel package as well: %files devel %license COPYING As for the "incorrect-fsf-address" errors, the guidelines recommend contacting upstream: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Common_Rpmlint_issues#incorrect-fsf-address I've personally never seen this before, but it's not a blocking issue either way. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
