https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1860688 --- Comment #4 from Paul Townsend <p@xxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Andy Mender from comment #3) > Also, and this is totally my fault, according to the licensing guidelines > (https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing: > Main?rd=Licensing#SoftwareLicenses), "GPL" alone is not a valid license. It > should say "GPL+", which translates to "A GPL or LGPL licensed package that > lacks any statement of what version that it's licensed under". No problem at all, I will change License: to "BSD and GPL+". > As a last check I ran extra Koji builds for Fedora 32 and 33 - all clear: > - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47886526 > - https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=47886434 > > Package approved! You just need a sponsor now :). That's great, thank you very much for your time! -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
