https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1858531 --- Comment #7 from Luya Tshimbalanga <luya_tfz@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- Thank you for the fix. The build is successful this time. I figured out some build requirements lack pkgconfig files on Fedora 31 when testing the scratch build so I adjusted the condition. (In reply to Robert-André Mauchin 🐧 from comment #6) > libpartio-devel requires libpartio instead of the main package. You might > need to adjust the Summary/Description to reflect what's actually packaged > (i.e. main package containing the tools and libpartio containing the lib) > > %files -n libpartio > %license LICENSE > %{_libdir}/*.so.1* Is "%files lib" an equivalent partio-devel requires partio-lib? Some packages used that method. > - Also remove the tabs introduced in line 12, line 55, line 58 Fixed > - Do not use ExcludeArch but ExclusiveArch with the arches you support. I find out it is unneeded. Here is the updated files: SPEC: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luya/openshadinglanguage/fedora-32-x86_64/01563228-partio/partio.spec SRPM: https://download.copr.fedorainfracloud.org/results/luya/openshadinglanguage/fedora-32-x86_64/01563228-partio/partio-1.10.1-3.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
