Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 ------- Additional Comments From jonathan.underwood@xxxxxxxxx 2007-10-26 11:18 EST ------- (In reply to comment #10) > FWIW I also like the errata package: > > o Upstream experts provide the needed delta is bite-ready form Is that true? I looked and found no trace of an upstream errata package. [snip] > I also don't think this needs any special fesco/fpc blessing, but if people > object, then please raise it there and we will discuss it and give it a blessing > or a no-go. > It was raised already, and you even commented :) See https://www.redhat.com/archives/fedora-packaging/2007-August/msg00019.html Feelings were mixed, no consensus was reached. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review