Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: texlive-texmf-errata - Errata for texlive-texmf https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=229182 axel.thimm@xxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |axel.thimm@xxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From axel.thimm@xxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-26 11:03 EST ------- FWIW I also like the errata package: o Upstream experts provide the needed delta is bite-ready form o Packager can react almost immediately, so users get their hands sooner on the fixes o No stress for mirrors (yes, even in a delta rpm world, the mirror will have to waste bandwidth for updates of megapackages) Asking from the packager to do micro-dismantling of the tarballs is IMHO a waste of his time, I'd rather see him use that time in some other tex/latex packages than to merge erratas and re-subpackage everything again. I also don't think this needs any special fesco/fpc blessing, but if people object, then please raise it there and we will discuss it and give it a blessing or a no-go. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are the QA contact for the bug, or are watching the QA contact. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review