https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1826439 --- Comment #26 from Honggang LI <honli@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Michal Schmidt from comment #25) > (In reply to Honggang LI from comment #24) > > In real HPC production environment, we are always to lifted the resource for > > all users. For example, see "13.5.3. Relaxing memlock restrictions for users" > > > > https://access.redhat.com/documentation/en-us/red_hat_enterprise_linux/7/ > > html/networking_guide/sec-configuring_the_base_rdma_subsystem > > Do we ship this config file in a package? No, but we setup it with kickstart scripts for our internal cluster. [root@rdma-dev-01 ~]$ cat /etc/security/limits.d/rdma.conf # configuration for rdma performance tuning * soft memlock unlimited * hard memlock unlimited * soft stack unlimited * hard stack unlimited * soft core unlimited * hard core unlimited # rdma tuning end > It's one thing to suggest administrators to configure their systems in a > certain way. It still requires a concious decision on their part. > It's another thing to ship this config in a package. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
