https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1832562 --- Comment #7 from Ankur Sinha (FranciscoD) <sanjay.ankur@xxxxxxxxx> --- Thanks Michael, Purusharth: please look at these comments when you have a minute. The regressions in the spec should be corrected, as I'd explained in the channel: the review is incremental so we need to make sure that issues which were already fixed in the spec should not crop up again. Then we can check to see whether the API is public/private (if private, then you drop the -devel package and only ship the binaries). Please drop a comment here when you've made some progress and we'll carry on with the review. Or find me in the channels sometime and we can go over things together too. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx