https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1353169 José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags|needinfo?(jamatos@xxxxxxxx) | --- Comment #44 from José Matos <jamatos@xxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #43) > > Please document the bundled dependencies and their versions and why, per the > policy. > > Cf. https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/packaging-guidelines/#bundling > Cf. > https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Bundled_Libraries#Requirement_if_you_bundle > > I would prefer to see tzlocal unbundled, though I can accept this upstream > preferring otherwise as long as it is documented properly. FWIW I agree with you and I intend to work on unbundling tzlocal, if possible to have this work applied upstream. The other module it is not in pypi and so not it causes less concern. The new version with just that change is here: Spec URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola.spec SRPM URL: https://jamatos.fedorapeople.org/python-nikola-8.0.4-6.fc32.src.rpm -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
