https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1813687 --- Comment #7 from Nikola Forró <nforro@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > None of the other Aspell language directories seem to have key verification. That's because all the other aspell dictionaries predate the current packaging guidelines by a long time. > Should this step be skipped? If not, how should the key file be uploaded (documentation suggests to upload, but does not indicate procedure to do this so that the verification step passes)? The guidelines say: If the upstream project does not publish a keyring file, then you may need to create a keyring after you have verified the key. In this case there is no upstream URL to the keyring, so instead you should document how you created the keyring in a comment in the spec file. The keyring file should be commited to dist-git. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
