[Bug 1812411] Review request: bookworm - simple, focused eBook reader

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812411

Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> changed:

           What    |Removed                     |Added
----------------------------------------------------------------------------
                 CC|                            |decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx



--- Comment #2 from Fabio Valentini <decathorpe@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Artur Iwicki from comment #1)
> >License:  GPL-3
> The proper identifier in Fedora is "GPLv3".
> https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses
> 
> Also, from upstream's meson.build:
> ># project name and programming language
> >project('com.github.babluboy.bookworm', ['vala', 'c'],
> >    version: '1.1.2'
> >)


> I'm not sure if using the full name is a good idea here, since if you look
> into your built package, you'll see that the executable that's put in
> /usr/bin ends up called "com.github.babluboy.bookworm". While many packages
> in Fedora use reverse-domain-name full names for .desktop and .appdata.xml
> files, I'm not sure if any do that for the binaries and /usr/share stuff.
> Maybe someone more knowledgeable about the subject could share their opinion.

This is the way all "made for elementary" / appcenter applications are set up.
It's a bit unusual to also use the RDNN name for the executable, but since it
works and the application is expected to be launched from a launcher anyway,
it's not a problem.

You can look at other elementary applications for examles of this.

(That doesn't mean I agree with them on this decision - I'd much rather have an
executable be named elementary-music instead of io.elementary.music, but that's
upstream's decision, in the end. At least they have consistent guidelines for
this stuff.)

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux