https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1812411 Artur Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |fedora@xxxxxxxxxx Doc Type|--- |If docs needed, set a value --- Comment #1 from Artur Iwicki <fedora@xxxxxxxxxx> --- >License: GPL-3 The proper identifier in Fedora is "GPLv3". https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Licensing:Main#Good_Licenses Also, from upstream's meson.build: ># project name and programming language >project('com.github.babluboy.bookworm', ['vala', 'c'], > version: '1.1.2' >) I'm not sure if using the full name is a good idea here, since if you look into your built package, you'll see that the executable that's put in /usr/bin ends up called "com.github.babluboy.bookworm". While many packages in Fedora use reverse-domain-name full names for .desktop and .appdata.xml files, I'm not sure if any do that for the binaries and /usr/share stuff. Maybe someone more knowledgeable about the subject could share their opinion. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
