https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1802803 --- Comment #5 from Michael Cronenworth <mike@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Omair Majid from comment #4) > %files -n dotnet-host > %dir %{_libdir}/dotnet > > And dotnet-host needs to be installed for any other subpackage in this > package to be installed. Can you help me figure out what other subpackage > needs to own /usr/lib64/dotnet? You're right. I missed that %files line. No need to fix anything here. fedora-review didn't catch it. > > - nethost.h is installed. Is it required for the runtime to run? It should > > go into a -devel subpackage, ideally. > > Supposedly, it's part of the runtime, since it is placed under > `/usr/lib64/dotnet/shared/`, and `shared` is just a short form of "Shared > Framework" aka "Runtime". I dont think the runtime itself requires it. It > sounds like this is a way to host the .NET Core runtime > (https://docs.microsoft.com/en-us/dotnet/core/tutorials/netcore-hosting) in > a native application. If this is the only file, does it still make sense to > put it in a separate -devel package? If it is not in use by the runtime then yes a -devel package is required by the guidelines. > > - > > /usr/lib64/dotnet/shared/Microsoft.NETCore.App/3.1.1/System.Security. > > Cryptography.Native.OpenSsl.a - is this static library necessary for the > > runtime to run? It needs to either be removed or go into a -static > > subpackage if it is not necessary. > > This is a bit complicated and even upstream doesn't have a very good handle > on it: https://github.com/dotnet/runtime/issues/3447. As I understand it, > some types of .NET applications require (or will require) the static > libraries (at build-time?). > > Perhaps I should create a dotnet-runtime-3.1-devel subpackage and put the .h > and .a files in it? I wonder what impact that might have if the files are > not present and the user tries to build applications... Looks like they are leaning to remove static libs. Would a C header and a static library be necessary to build a C# app? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
