https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762856 --- Comment #11 from Josh Stone <jistone@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Yeah, we'll have to either make those arch-specific, or figure out and fix the hash difference. I suspect it's just the host triple getting mixed in there. IIRC the last time I tried this, libraries built on one host type were still usable from another host type (both different than the actual target). Most of the upstream host binaries are also cross-compiled from x86_64, which supports that the original host shouldn't really matter. Will rpmdiff also complain about noarch if we achieve the same filenames, but not completely identical binary contents? I'm not sure the build is 100% reproducible yet. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
