https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1762856 --- Comment #10 from Sandro Mani <manisandro@xxxxxxxxx> --- On my part I'm open to whichever approach allows me to finally update mingw-librsvg ;) But I suspect that I'd be hitting the same issue I'm currently hitting with this approach, namely that the package builds fine on all arches [1], but ultimately fails with BuildError: The following noarch package built differently on different architectures: mingw32-rust-debuginfo-1.41.0-1.fc32.noarch.rpm rpmdiff output was: added /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/lib/rustlib/i686-pc-windows-gnu/lib/std-639345594c286378.dll.debug removed /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/lib/rustlib/i686-pc-windows-gnu/lib/std-cf288f9e2d3c8cc5.dll.debug removed /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/lib/rustlib/i686-pc-windows-gnu/lib/test-8bf4c31ff797f1ad.dll.debug added /usr/i686-w64-mingw32/lib/rustlib/i686-pc-windows-gnu/lib/test-c56b86867130dddf.dll.debug Basically it looks like the hashes in the filenames are not stable. I've so far not found any pointers out there on how to control these. @Josh, any ideas perhaps? FWIW, here is the latest attempt: Spec URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-rust.spec SRPM URL: https://smani.fedorapeople.org/review/mingw-rust-1.41.0-1.fc32.src.rpm [1] https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=41395327 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
