https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1793156 --- Comment #14 from William Cohen <wcohen@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi, The files for third-party/blake2 can be licensed under any of three choices (CC0, ASL2.0 or openssl) according to: https://github.com/BLAKE2/BLAKE2/tree/5cbb39c9ef8007f0b63723e3aea06cd0887e36ad The CC0 is being used as that appears to be the one mentioned in the upstream rr packaging. Comments have been added to the spec file to clarify which files are covered by which licenses. rr.spec takes ownership of the /usr/lib64/rr and /usr/share/rr directories The updated srpm and spec files are: http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/rr/rr-5.3.0-8.20200124git7908fea.fc30.src.rpm http://people.redhat.com/wcohen/rr/rr.spec -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
