Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 ------- Additional Comments From jochen@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-09 10:30 EST ------- (In reply to comment #1) > kaya.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 > The licensing page specifies "LGPLv2" even for 2.1. > > The headers are OK, although it would probably be cleaner if they were grouped > together in a subdirectory instead of strewn through /usr/lib/kaya. Done, > Binaries named /usr/bin/rekey and /usr/bin/xml2man seem destined to conflict > with something. /usr/bin/xml2man is present on macos and some Linux distros but > doesn't actually seem to be in Fedora. /usr/bin/rekey amazingly doesn't > conflict with anything. Still, both names are awfully generic for binaries that > are specific to this package. Is there any reasonable chance of getting them > renamed with a prefix like "kaya-"? I think, this is a design issue from the upstream and I don't try to make a rename, because I afraid to confused poeple who try to use the tutorials. Spec URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya.spec SRPM URL: http://www.herr-schmitt.de/pub/kaya/kaya-0.2.6-2.fc7.src.rpm -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review