Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: kaya - A Statically typed, imperative programming-language https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=286851 tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- CC| |tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx ------- Additional Comments From tibbs@xxxxxxxxxxx 2007-09-29 12:10 EST ------- A couple of comments: kaya.x86_64: W: invalid-license LGPLv2.1 The licensing page specifies "LGPLv2" even for 2.1. The headers are OK, although it would probably be cleaner if they were grouped together in a subdirectory instead of strewn through /usr/lib/kaya. Binaries named /usr/bin/rekey and /usr/bin/xml2man seem destined to conflict with something. /usr/bin/xml2man is present on macos and some Linux distros but doesn't actually seem to be in Fedora. /usr/bin/rekey amazingly doesn't conflict with anything. Still, both names are awfully generic for binaries that are specific to this package. Is there any reasonable chance of getting them renamed with a prefix like "kaya-"? -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review