https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1770147 --- Comment #6 from Stefan Midjich <swehack@xxxxxxxxx> --- Created attachment 1645283 --> https://bugzilla.redhat.com/attachment.cgi?id=1645283&action=edit New spec file based on go2rpm and commented to explain questionable methodology I'm still trying to resolve some SElinux issues where ntsclient is running in init_t context even though its binary is labeled ntsclient_exec_t. Strangely because I've made no changes to the policy and this happened after uninstalling the old functional package, replacing it with the new package based on this new spec. But this is an initial draft where I've addressed the comments and the parts I did not want to change I have commented to explain why. Mainly it's because we're using a Debian based image in our CI/CD build pipeline and macros that might exist on Fedora do not exist there. I'm also not 100% sure about the src package, the goal for me is to create a binary package but the source package requires manual installation of all Golang dependencies. If our goal is a binary package, are we still forced to separately package all its dependencies? I was unable to build the package using the %go_generate_buildrequires macro. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
