[Bug 1774713] Review Request: virt-v2v - Convert a virtual machine to run on KVM

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1774713



--- Comment #10 from Kashyap Chamarthy <kchamart@xxxxxxxxxx> ---
======
Review
======

(NB: My comments in the longer review are prefixed with [kashyapc].)

tl;dr
=====

Needs Fixing
~~~~~~~~~~~~

(1) '%license' macro is missing.

(2) License file is not included when you install debuginfo (or any
    other sub-packages).

(3) The many packages listed under "Dirs in package are owned also by:
    [...]" are all related to 'bash-completion'.  I _think_ that's
    benign; Rich, please double-confirm; I marked the item as [x ...
    ?].

    Rich has raised it on 'fedora-devel':
   
https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/packaging@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx/thread/H572VSN6O5H32SKIDR5ZIKU5DFN76SBD/

(4) Seems like documentation size is 30720 bytes in 1 files.  Needs a
    separate -doc subpackage?

(5) Missing %{?_isa} macro for subpackages -- Rich said on IRC he's
    going to put it in, "although that's not really needed for OCaml
    programs"

(6) Need to use the '%{gpgverify}' macro (instead of `gpgv2` in the %prep
    section).

(7) Strangely, `rpmlint` further below complaints of an "invalid URL",
    but it works for me:

       invalid-url URL: https://github.com/libguestfs/virt-v2v <urlopen
       error [Errno -2] Name or service not known>


Observations
~~~~~~~~~~~~

(*) Question asked/answered on IRC: "What if a user has 'virt-v2v' from
    libguestfs, and updates her Fedora host which brings 'virt-v2v' as
    its _own_ package?"  Answer (from Rich):  

        "Yeah, hopefully; I'm only proposing to make this change in
        Rawhide.  Note the binary package isn't being renamed, it's just
        produced by a different source"

(*) The "ExcludeArch" for i686 is justifiable; hence I gave the [x].
    Comment inline.

(*) `rpmlint` marks the below two as ERRORs:

        virt-v2v.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot /usr/bin/virt-v2v
        virt-v2v.x86_64: E: missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot
/usr/bin/virt-v2v-copy-to-local

    Rich confirmed on IRC that the above is a false positive: "I guess
    because the OCaml Unix module is statically linked in, and that has
    bindings for every POSIX call"

    Reference: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1396563 --
               rpmlint often reports false positives
               missing-call-to-chdir-with-chroot on x86_64

                    * * *

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux