https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1764813 --- Comment #12 from Sergio Monteiro Basto <sergio@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Neal Gompa from comment #11) > (In reply to Dridi Boukelmoune from comment #10) > > > > Also as per the guidelines I think we should follow upstream (sub)packaging > > as prior art: > > > > - apt-libs: split into libapt-pkg and libapt-inst We don't need follow Debian packing way in fedora we don't use libfoo we use foo-libs , specially if main program is a executable not a library. > The splitting is unnecessary. Moreover, libapt-inst is gone now. > > > - libapt-pkg: make it provide libapt-pkg%{soname} > > What would be the point? I can do it, but the generated library Provides are > what we usually rely on for this... > > > - libapt-inst: make it provide libapt-inst%{soname} > > This library is gone. > > > - apt-devel: rename to libapt-pkg-devel > > - apt-devel-doc: rename to libapt-pkg-doc > > > > I'm not going to do this. People should not rely on package names like this > when building against it. Instead, they should rely on pkgconfig() / cmake() > Provides that RPM generates. That said, I already include those names as > Provides for the subpackages in question. libapt-pkg-devel, libapt-pkg-doc is debian names , apt-devel and apt-devel-doc are the correct name Also URL https://tracker.debian.org/pkg/apt is must better than https://packages.debian.org/source/buster/apt By packing guidelines the old apt should be retired and should be already retired a long time ago and package should be orphan. After we should do package review as we did here and request the package again a simple releng ticket. The package review was approve and is ready to be imported. Also fedora-package-config-apt should be retired and not be a zombie on stable releases. In my opinion , we should avoid splitting packages in many sub-packages without a good reason -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
