https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1326504 Jun Aruga <jaruga@xxxxxxxxxx> changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Flags| |fedora-review? | |needinfo?(bloch@xxxxxxxxxxx | |m) --- Comment #32 from Jun Aruga <jaruga@xxxxxxxxxx> --- Hi Dave, > Sorry, it isn't my review to approve, and I can't spend much time on it. I'm happy to be corrected about shared libraries by someone authoritative in Fedora, and I don't know what htslib's policy is on ABI changes and whether the ELF semantics actually do follow the upstream version number. Yeah. Alright. Please do "I'm happy to be corrected about shared libraries by someone authoritative in Fedora", and let me know. Hi Adam https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Package_Review_Process#Review_Process > if you want to formally review the package, set the fedora-review flag to ? and assign the bug to yourself. I changed the flag to ? by following the the review process. I am "packager" in the document. I already inherited from original reporter Sam. [1] > ACCEPT - If the package is good, set the fedora-review flag to + I want to ask you to change "the fedora-review flag to +" from "?" if you are okay. [1] https://github.com/SamStudio8/htslib-pkg/pull/3#issuecomment-529875690 -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
