https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1756331 --- Comment #6 from Petr Šplíchal <psplicha@xxxxxxxxxx> --- > > Unfortunately we still have a couple of tools in process of > > migration to Python 3 so the Python 2 subpackage is necessary. > > Hopefully soon we'll have everything Python 3 only and the spec > > file will become much more simple. > > What tools? I don't understand why the Python 2 package is only > needed in Fedora 29, but not Fedora 30. python-nitrate is still on the way: BZ#1727936 But hopefully to migration will soon be finished. > > So the %{python3_pkgversion} is not needed any more? If you see > > anything which can be simplified I'm definitely open to make it > > more readable. > > %{python3_pkgversion} is only needed for Python 3 on EPEL 6 and 7. Clearly, > the spec is designed to not build Python 3 on EPEL 6 and 7. > %{python3_pkgversion} is not needed in Fedora or EPEL 8. I see, thanks for clarification. Thinking about it a little bit more, we could probably just go with Python 3. Only RHEL7 would be Python 2. What do you think? -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
