https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1754957 --- Comment #5 from Aron Griffis <aron@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxx> --- I realized I'm overthinking this. The OpenSUSE builds seem to work fine with the -DBUILD_MODULE=ON approach. On Tumbleweed I see (leaving out the uninteresting parts) # rpm -ql lua51-luv-1.30.1-1.1.x86_64 /usr/lib64/lua/5.1/luv.so # rpm -ql lua51-luv-devel /usr/include/lua5.1/luv/lhandle.h /usr/include/lua5.1/luv/lreq.h /usr/include/lua5.1/luv/lthreadpool.h /usr/include/lua5.1/luv/luv.h /usr/include/lua5.1/luv/util.h and there is no pkgconfig file. So we shouldn't need one on Fedora either, and that means your rpm is fine. Sorry for the fuss, Andreas. 🤦 For the neovim 0.4.2 build, it seems we just need to indicate where to find libluv. This works in my experiments: %if %{with luajit} %global luaver 5.1 %else %global luaver 5.3 %endif -DLIBLUV_INCLUDE_DIR=%{_includedir}/lua-%{luaver} \ -DLIBLUV_LIBRARY=%{_libdir}/lua/%{luaver}/luv.so \ That assumes that the proper version of libvterm is available. -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
