[Bug 1747552] Review Request: libdfp - Decimal Floating Point library

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1747552



--- Comment #2 from stli@xxxxxxxxxxxxx ---
I've adjusted the spec file according to your comments.
But I can't use make_install as it would setup DESTDIR instead of install_root.

You'll find the current spec-file here:
https://pagure.io/fork/stliibm/libdfp/blob/stli-20190904/f/libdfp.spec
I've also created a pull-request: https://pagure.io/libdfp/pull-request/1

I've also performed some scratch builds for ppc64le and s390x on:
-F30: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37456479
-F31: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37456559
-epel8: https://koji.fedoraproject.org/koji/taskinfo?taskID=37456581

They are all green despite of epel8 on s390x where I've got test-fails:
FAIL: test-cast-to-overflow
FAIL: test-cast-to-underflow
=> These tests fails due to a missing patch in gcc (see
https://github.com/libdfp/libdfp/issues/71#issuecomment-420614177). The patch
was backported to gcc 8.3.

According to the logs for the epel8 build, gcc-8.2.1-3.5.el8.src.rpm was used.
Will epel8 use a newer gcc-8.3.* as soon as such a newer version is available
in RHEL 8?

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux