https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745478 --- Comment #6 from Jiri Olsa <jolsa@xxxxxxxxxx> --- (In reply to Iñaki Ucar from comment #5) > (In reply to Jiri Olsa from comment #3) > > however, upstream team decided to keep and maintain GitHub libbpf > > sources (which are regirarly sync from kernel tree) to maintain > > compatibility in between distributions and mainly to have stable > > relases of libbpf based on github tree tags rather then on random > > kernel versions (from libbpf point of view) > > But that GitHub mirror follows bpf-next, right? So the question is whether right > it could happen that an update of the standalone libbpf has a soname bump > that makes it incompatible with the kernel versions packaged in Fedora > (which cannot happen if libbpf is a subpackage of kernel-tools, because it > has the same versioning and provides from the same "snapshot"). well at the moment nothing depends on libbpf and libbpf itself checks on kernel features before using them, so I don't see any possible incompatibility issue new libbpf has the 'Epoch:1' set, so it takes over old libbpf smoothly jirka -- You are receiving this mail because: You are on the CC list for the bug. You are always notified about changes to this product and component _______________________________________________ package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/ List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
