[Bug 1745478] Review Request: libbpf - The bpf library from kernel source

[Date Prev][Date Next][Thread Prev][Thread Next][Date Index][Thread Index]

 



https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=1745478



--- Comment #5 from Iñaki Ucar <i.ucar86@xxxxxxxxx> ---
(In reply to Jiri Olsa from comment #3)
> however, upstream team decided to keep and maintain GitHub libbpf
> sources (which are regirarly sync from kernel tree) to maintain
> compatibility in between distributions and mainly to have stable
> relases of libbpf based on github tree tags rather then on random
> kernel versions (from libbpf point of view)

But that GitHub mirror follows bpf-next, right? So the question is whether it
could happen that an update of the standalone libbpf has a soname bump that
makes it incompatible with the kernel versions packaged in Fedora (which cannot
happen if libbpf is a subpackage of kernel-tools, because it has the same
versioning and provides from the same "snapshot").

-- 
You are receiving this mail because:
You are on the CC list for the bug.
You are always notified about changes to this product and component
_______________________________________________
package-review mailing list -- package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
To unsubscribe send an email to package-review-leave@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx
Fedora Code of Conduct: https://docs.fedoraproject.org/en-US/project/code-of-conduct/
List Guidelines: https://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Mailing_list_guidelines
List Archives: https://lists.fedoraproject.org/archives/list/package-review@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx




[Index of Archives]     [Fedora Users]     [Fedora Desktop]     [Fedora SELinux]     [Yosemite Conditions]     [KDE Users]

  Powered by Linux