Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: setools - SELinux policy analysis tools https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=280541 ------- Additional Comments From mtasaka@xxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxxx 2007-10-03 05:13 EST ------- For 3.3.1-5: * Dependency - For -devel subpackage ------------------------------------------------- Requires: setools = %{version}-%{release} ------------------------------------------------- This means -devel subpackage requires -libs, -libs-tcl, -gui, -console subpackages? * Desktop files - For example, /usr/share/applications/apol.desktop contains: ------------------------------------------------- Categories=Application;System;X-Red-Hat-Base; ------------------------------------------------- Here the categories "Application" "X-Red-Hat-Base" are deprecated and they should be removed. * Duplicate file entry You can check if duplicate file entry exists by checking "warning: File listed twice" message in build.log. - For -libs-python subpackage: -------------------------------------------------- %{pkg_py_lib}/ %{pkg_py_arch}/ -------------------------------------------------- This is the same directory on i386, x86_64 so these file entries are duplicate. The correct one is: -------------------------------------------------- %{pkg_py_lib}/ %ifarch x86_64 ppc64 %{pkg_py_arch}/ %endif -------------------------------------------------- - For -gui subpackage: -------------------------------------------------- %{tcllibdir}/apol_tcl/ %{tcllibdir}/apol_tcl/pkgIndex.tcl -------------------------------------------------- "%{tcllibdir}/apol_tcl/" entry contains "%{tcllibdir}/apol_tcl/pkgIndex.tcl" Then: ------------------------------------------------------------- NOTE: Before being sponsored: This package will be accepted with another few work. But before I accept this package, someone (I am a candidate) must sponsor you. Once you are sponsored, you have the right to review other submitters' review requests and approve the packages formally. For this reason, the person who want to be sponsored (like you) are required to "show that you have an understanding of the process and of the packaging guidelines" as is described on : http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/PackageMaintainers/HowToGetSponsored Usually there are two ways to show this. A. submit other review requests with enough quality. B. Do a "pre-review" of other person's review request (at the time you are not sponsored, you cannot do a formal review) When you have submitted a new review request or have pre-reviewed other person's review request, please write the bug number on this bug report so that I can check your comments or review request. Fedora package collection review requests which are waiting for someone to review can be checked on: http://fedoraproject.org/PackageReviewStatus/NEW.html (NOTE: please don't choose "Merge Review") Review guidelines are described mainly on: http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ReviewGuidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/Guidelines http://fedoraproject.org/wiki/Packaging/ScriptletSnippets ------------------------------------------------------------ -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review