Please do not reply directly to this email. All additional comments should be made in the comments box of this bug report. Summary: Review Request: new - A simple template system https://bugzilla.redhat.com/show_bug.cgi?id=250040 mike@xxxxxxxx changed: What |Removed |Added ---------------------------------------------------------------------------- Status|NEEDINFO |ASSIGNED Flag|needinfo?(mike@xxxxxxxx) | ------- Additional Comments From mike@xxxxxxxx 2007-10-01 22:01 EST ------- Spec URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new.spec SRPM URL: http://flyn.org/SRPMS/new-1.3.11-2.fc8.src.rpm I'd like to get this thing approved. The objection regarding the configure/check warning is more appropriate to be submitted as a bug against new. I fail to see why this would be relevant to approving the package, other than violating Ralf's personal preferences. The message clearly says "warning," so it is obviously not fatal. I added --disable-static to my %configure line. As far as the name, new has been in development since 1999. It has been included in several distributions, including Fedora (I am only resubmitting it because the package was orphaned). No one has complained about the name until now. -- Configure bugmail: https://bugzilla.redhat.com/userprefs.cgi?tab=email ------- You are receiving this mail because: ------- You are on the CC list for the bug, or are watching someone who is. _______________________________________________ Fedora-package-review mailing list Fedora-package-review@xxxxxxxxxx http://www.redhat.com/mailman/listinfo/fedora-package-review